Automating judgment? Algorithmic judgment, news knowledge, and journalistic professionalism

an article by Matt Carlson (Saint Louis University, USA) published in New Media & Society Volume 20 Issue 5 (May 2018)

Abstract

Journalistic judgment is both a central and fraught function of journalism.

The privileging of objectivity norms and the externalization of newsworthiness in discourses about journalism leave little room for the legitimation of journalists’ subjective judgment. This tension has become more apparent in the digital news era due to the growing use of algorithms in automated news distribution and production.

This article argues that algorithmic judgment should be considered distinct from journalists’ professional judgment.

Algorithmic judgment presents a fundamental challenge to news judgment based on the twin beliefs that human subjectivity is inherently suspect and in need of replacement, while algorithms are inherently objective and in need of implementation.

The supplanting of human judgment with algorithmic judgment has significant consequences for both the shape of news and its legitimating discourses.

Before I even glanced at the full text my head was reeling. Yes, humans make mistakes but not as often as a badly written algorithm which will get it wrong every time.

Full text (PDF 18pp)

---