an article by Moshe Maor (The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel) published in Policy & Politics Volume 46 Number 1 (January 2018)
Abstract
This article distinguishes between disproportionate policy response by error (bounded rationality) and disproportionate response by choice, and advances a further distinction of such choices between two disproportionate policy options, namely, rhetoric and doctrine.
Probing the 'plausibility' of these terms, the article presents pertinent illustrations drawn from the military, financial and environmental domains in the US, Britain, Israel, Australia, Singapore and the European Union.
These illustrations show that, during pre-crisis and in-crisis periods, both options can be purposefully designed to signal policymakers’ preference and/or to deliver the disproportionate responses in pursuit of policy goals.
Hazel’s comment
I wish I could give you a link to continue reading on this one. I have definitely marked it to read in the British Library on my next visit.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment