an article by Kellan Anfinson (University of South Florida, Tampa, USA) published in Environmental Politics Volume 27 Issue 2 (2018)
Abstract
Scientific knowledge, it is argued, is insufficient to overcome climate skepticism. Spiritual truth is proposed as a way to do so.
First, the cases of Eric Holthaus and Paul Kingsnorth are examined. Though they knew about climate change, they were only able to tell the truth and act on it after a personal collapse that transformed them. Telling the truth in this way carried a political force that their previous advocacy did not.
These figures help animate and adapt Foucault’s notion of spiritual truth for climate change.
Finally, this theory of spiritual truth is compared to Naomi Klein’s argument that climate science determines political truth and Bruno Latour’s argument that politics should decide the truth of climate science.
Spiritual truth accommodates the insights these perspectives provide while adding transformation as a key element for telling the truth about climate change.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment