Abstract
This article puts forward a theory of the role of digital media in social change. It begins by criticizing three theories that currently dominate our understanding of digital media and of media generally:
- network theory,
- mediatization theory and
- actor-network theory.
It also identifies a gap in current communication theory, namely, that digital media mostly do not fit the divide into mass and interpersonal communication.
A further problem is that insufficient attention is given to the difference between political communication and popular culture or everyday life.
The article develops an alternative, focusing on four countries that provide a range of relationships between media and society; the U.S., Sweden, India and China. In all four countries, despite their differences, digital media, in contrast to traditional broadcast and interpersonal media, have led to a more differentiated media landscape.
Greater complexity in political communication nevertheless runs up against the continuing dominance of elite agenda-setting.
In terms of popular culture, all four countries have experienced a proliferation of media offerings and greater tetheredness between people. Hence, new divides are emerging between more active and variegated as against more passive and restricted media uses.
The article concludes with implications of digital media for understanding media generally: with new digital media, there is now a need to rethink media theory in terms of fundamental debates about how media transform or preserve the social order.
No comments:
Post a Comment