an article by Tyler M. John, Joseph Millum and David Wasserman (Clinical Center Department of Bioethics, Bethesda, Maryland, USA) published in Economics & Philosophy Volume 33 Issue 2 (July 2017)
Abstract
One widely used method for allocating health care resources involves the use of cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) to rank treatments in terms of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. CEA has been criticized for discriminating against people with disabilities by valuing their lives less than those of non-disabled people. Avoiding discrimination seems to lead to the 'QALY trap': we cannot value saving lives equally and still value raising quality of life. This paper reviews existing responses to the QALY trap and argues that all are problematic. Instead, we argue that adopting a moderate form of prioritarianism avoids the QALY trap and disability discrimination.
Full text (PDF) please note copyright conditions
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment