Abstract
National governments use evidence selectively to argue that a successful policy intervention in one local area should be emulated in others ('evidence-based best practice').
However, the value of such evidence is always limited because there is:
- disagreement on the best way to gather evidence of policy success,
- uncertainty regarding the extent to which we can draw general conclusions from specific evidence, and
- local policymaker opposition to interventions not developed in local areas.
How do governments respond to this dilemma?
This article identifies the Scottish Government response: it supports three potentially contradictory ways to gather evidence and encourage emulation.
No comments:
Post a Comment