Which type of job mobility makes people happy? A comparative analysis of European welfare regimes

an article by Anette Eva Fasang (Humboldt-University Berlin and Social Science Research Centre Berlin) and Sara Geerdes and Klaus Schömann (Jacobs University Bremen, Germany) published in International Sociology Volume 27 Number 3 (May 2012)

Abstract

In view of changing job mobility patterns in Europe, the impact of job mobility on job satisfaction is gaining importance, yet has received little attention. This article analyses 23 European countries to address two questions:

1. how do different types of job mobility affect job satisfaction, and
2. do welfare state regimes alter the relationship between job mobility and job satisfaction?

Theoretically the study integrates economic and sociological approaches to job satisfaction with insights from the psychology of well-being.

The findings show that job mobility differentially affects job satisfaction domains. External upward mobility is decisive to enhance satisfaction with objective working conditions and work–life balance, while internal mobility is pivotal for satisfaction with future career prospects.

The experience of unemployment lowers all job satisfaction domains even after re-employment. The article’s findings on welfare regimes indicate that social policies interact with country differences in workforce composition, such as the overall prevalence of unemployment, to determine job satisfaction.

---