an article by Chrysa Leventi, Holly Sutherland and Iva Valentinova Tasseva (University of Essex, UK) published in Journal of European Social Policy Volume 29 Issue 1 (February 2019)
Abstract
This article examines how income poverty is affected by changes to the scale of tax-benefit policies and which are the most cost-effective policies in reducing poverty or limiting its increase in seven diverse EU countries.
We do that by measuring the implications of increasing/reducing the scale of each policy instrument, using microsimulation methods while holding constant the policy design and national context.
We consider commonly applied policy instruments with a direct effect on household income: child benefits, social assistance, income tax lower thresholds and a benchmark case of rescaling the whole tax-benefit system.
We find that the assessment of the most cost-effective instrument may depend on the measure of poverty used and the direction and scale of the change. Nevertheless, our results indicate that the options that reduce poverty most cost-effectively in most countries are increasing child benefits and social assistance, while reducing the former is a particularly poverty-increasing way of making budgetary cuts.
Full text (PDF 15pp)
Tuesday, 19 February 2019
Improving poverty reduction in Europe: What works best where?
Labels:
EU,
microsimulation,
policy reform,
poverty,
social_and_fiscal_policy
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment