Abstract
Drawing on a thematic analysis of longitudinal qualitative data (ntotal = 118), this article takes a “whole student lifecycle” approach to examine how lower and higher income students at an English northern red brick university variously attempted to manage their individual budgets. It explores how students reconcile their income — in the form of loans, grants, and bursaries — with the cost of living.
Four arenas of interest are described:
- planning, budgeting, and managing “the student loan”;
- disruptions to financial planning;
- the role of familial support; and
- strategies of augmenting the budget.
It also supports an emerging body of literature that suggests that the continuing amendments to the system of funding higher education in England are unlikely to address inequality of access, participation, and outcome.
No comments:
Post a Comment