an article by Anthony F. Heath (Centre for Social Investigation, Nuffield College, UK) and Valentina Di Stasio (ERCOMER, Utrecht University, the Netherlands) published in The British Journal of Sociology Volume 70 Issue 5 (December 2019)
Abstract
Field experiments represent the gold standard for determining whether discrimination occurs.
Britain has a long and distinguished history of field experiments of racial discrimination in the labour market, with pioneering studies dating back to 1967 and 1969.
This article reviews all the published reports of these and subsequent British field experiments of racial discrimination in the labour market, including new results from a 2016/17 field experiment.
The article finds enduring contours of racial discrimination in Britain.
Firstly, there is an enduring pattern of modest discrimination against white minorities of European heritage in contrast to much greater risks of discrimination faced by the main non‐white groups, suggesting a strong racial component to discrimination.
Secondly, while there is some uncertainty about the magnitude of the risks facing applicants with Chinese and Indian names, the black Caribbean, black African and Pakistani groups all face substantial and very similar risks of discrimination.
Thirdly, there is no significant diminution in risks of discrimination over time either for Caribbeans or for South Asians as a whole.
These results are broadly in line with those from the ethnic penalties literature, suggesting that discrimination is likely to be a major factor explaining the disproportionately and enduringly high unemployment rates of ethnic minorities.
Labels:
discrimination, ethnic_minorities, labour_market, trends_over_time, ethnic_penalties,
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment