Highlights
- The study focuses on the relation between group-norms and cyber-bullying perpetration.
- The lower the level of cyberspace regulations the higher the levels of cyber-bullying.
- In-group identification moderates the relation between group-norms and cyber-bullying.
- In-group prototypicality moderates the relation between group-norms and cyber-bullying.
In the present research we analysed the social influence mechanisms that back the relation between peer group norms regarding cyber-bullying behaviours and individual cyber-bullying perpetration.
In a sample of adolescents (N = 3511, age: M = 16.27, SD = 1.58), we showed that the relation between perceived peer-norm and cyber-bullying perpetration was moderated by two distinct social influence mechanisms. Specifically, when individuals' lack of knowledge regarding appropriate behaviours in cyberspace (i.e., cyberspace regulations), levels of perceived peer-norm regarding cyber-bullying behaviours positively influence the participants' engagement in cyber-bullying perpetration (i.e., informational social influence).
Moreover, we showed that the higher the support of perceived peer-norm regarding cyber-bullying behaviours the higher the levels of cyber-bullying perpetration, especially for the higher (vs. lower) levels of identification with peers as the in-group; this relation was additionally enhanced at increasing levels of adolescents' in-group prototypicality (i.e., referential informative social influence).
The results demonstrated that the two social influence mechanisms work independently and likely contribute to predict participants’ engagement in cyber-bullying perpetration. Results are discussed with respect to the current literature regarding the social influence mechanisms underlying cyber-bullying. The implications of these findings for practical interventions are explored.
Full text (PDF 14pp)
Labels:
cyber-bullying. social_influence, social_identity, peer-norm, identification, prototypicality,
No comments:
Post a Comment