a post by Emily Chiang and Tim Grant for the OUP blog
“Black computer keyboard” by Florian Krumm. CC0 via Unsplash.
Between 2009 and 2011, a now convicted sexual offender in his early twenties was spending much of his time online persuading young girls and boys to produce and share with him sexual images and videos. To maximise his success, he would deceive and manipulate his victims by cycling through numerous different personas – a teenage boy, a young woman, a modelling agent, for example – seemingly trying to find the best fit for the person he was talking to.
Online anonymity is a significant hurdle in policing online sexual abuse, and cases like this are sadly common. As such, law enforcement agencies draw on expertise from a range of disciplines for support, including forensic linguistics. Given that this sort of online abuse occurs almost exclusively through language, linguists are in a unique position to assist police investigations by describing how language functions in various online criminal contexts as well as helping identify anonymous offenders through their language.
In the case mentioned above, the online abuse was enabled by multiple online identities. The man adopted 17 different personas. To understand how online abuse works, it’s important to consider two questions: First, what strategies did the offender use in the attempt to obtain images from victims? Second, did the 17 personas’ strategies vary, or were they linguistically consistent?
Continue reading
Labels:
anonymity, online_grooming, abuse, linguistics,
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment