an article by Francis Green and Golo Henseke (UCL Institute of Education) published in Oxford Review of Economic Policy Volume 32 Number 4 (Winter 2016)
Abstract
To assess potential public concerns, this paper examines theory and evidence surrounding
graduate educational underemployment (overeducation) in this era of mass higher education. Using
a new, validated, index of graduate jobs, we find that the prevalence of graduate underemployment
across 21 countries is correlated with the aggregate supply-demand imbalance, but not with indicators
of labour market flexibility.
Underemployment’s association with lower job satisfaction and pay is
widespread. Yet in most countries there are external benefits (social trust, volunteering, and political
efficacy) associated with higher education, even for those who are underemployed.
Taken together with
existing studies we find that, in this era of mass higher education participation, under-employment
is a useful indicator of the extent of macroeconomic disequilibrium in the graduate labour market.
We conclude that governments should monitor graduate underemployment, but that higher education
policy should be based on social returns and should recall higher education’s wider purposes.
JEL Classification: I23, I28, J2, J3, J4
Full text (PDF)
Friday, 17 February 2017
Should governments of OECD countries worry about graduate underemployment?
Labels:
higher_education,
mismatch,
over-education,
skills,
social_returns,
wages
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment