an article by Tamara Kayali Browne for the Guardian
Psychiatric diagnosis must serve an ethical purpose: relieving certain forms of suffering and disease. Science alone can’t do that
How do we decide what emotions, thoughts and behaviours are normal, abnormal or pathological?
This is essentially what a select group of psychiatrists decide each time they revise the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), considered a “bible” for mental health professionals worldwide.
But questions like this cannot be answered by scientists alone. This was famously demonstrated when homosexuality was declassified as a mental illness in the DSM in 1973. The decision was not based on new scientific evidence but came about due to pressure from activists. Cases such as this show the limitations of psychiatry and is where I believe philosophers, sociologists and ethicists could be of use.
Continue reading
Anyone, and I do mean anyone, who has ever been in contact with psychiatric diagnoses will find this interesting.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment