Highlights
- We reviewed and evaluated assessments of the career decision-making process.
- We distinguished among Antecedents, Effects on the Process, and Effects on the Decision.
- We classified 27 assessments into 5 categories and 15 subcategories.
- The assessments' psychometric properties and applicability were evaluated.
- This classification can help researchers and counselors locate relevant assessments.
Individuals are challenged by increasingly more career transitions in the 21st century. Each of these transitions entails making a career decision, typically by locating promising alternatives, collecting information about them, comparing the alternatives on the short list and choosing one.
Finding the areas where individuals are experiencing difficulties in this process is important for helping them and facilitating their career decision making.
The goal of the present review is to propose a taxonomy for analysing, comparing, and classifying assessments of the career decision-making process in terms of three facets:
- Antecedents – assessments of the challenges that may emerge prior to or during this process and cause difficulties,
- Effects of the challenges and difficulties on the process, namely, the individual's behavioural responses, and
- Effects on the decision, as reflected in individuals' career decision status and their feelings about the process and the outcome.
- Readiness includes assessments of dysfunctional beliefs about career decision making, career decision-making self-efficacy, willingness to engage in the process, and career indecisiveness;
- Orientation includes assessments of career decision-making styles and profiles, ways of coping with career decision-making, and adaptability; and
- Information includes assessments of difficulties that stem from feelings of Lack of information – about the self, the world of work, and how to make career decisions – or the Use of Information – unreliable information, internal conflicts, and external conflicts.
The psychometric properties of each assessment were evaluated, using the evidence-based assessment approach of Hunsley and Mash (2008). Inspecting and evaluating of the assessments show that most of them have a well-defined focus and evidence for acceptable reliability, but more evidence is needed for validity.
The advantages of unidimensional/multidimensional and homogeneous/heterogeneous assessments are discussed. Ways of incorporating the assessments of the antecedents of career decision-making difficulties effectively into career counselings are suggested, to help career counsellors better tailor their interventions to their clients' needs. The proposed categorisation can also help researchers locate the most relevant career decision-making process-based assessments and decide how to use them to measure specific constructs.
Full text (PDF 39pp)
Labels:
career_indecision, career_decision-making_assessment, career_indecisiveness, career_decision-making_process,
No comments:
Post a Comment