an article by Thomas Babila Sama, (University of Jyväskylä, Finland) published in The International Journal of Leadership in Public Services Volume 8 Issume 3 (2013)
Abstract
Purpose
This is a mixed method comparative case study. The aim of this paper is to find the role played by non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in the implementation of the active labour market policies (ALMPs) of Finland and Sweden, and also the relationship that the NGOs have with the government of the two countries.
Design/methodology/approach
Two NGOs were selected in Finland and one NGO was selected in Sweden for the data collection. The two selected NGOs in Finland were Jyväskylän Katulähetys in the City of Jyväskylä and Pirkanmaan Sininauha in the City of Tampere. Meanwhile, the one selected NGO in Sweden was Stockholms Stadsmission in the City of Stockholm.
Primary data were collected through questionnaires and interviews, while secondary data were collected from literature reviews, books and internet websites.
A total of 130 employees responded to the questionnaires from the two selected NGOs in Finland, while 140 employees responded from the one selected NGO in Sweden. The questionnaires were analysed using SPSS.
Findings
The findings revealed that first, the selected NGOs play active role in the implementation of the ALMPs of Finland and Sweden by employing long-term unemployed people in the labour market.
Second, the findings revealed that the selected NGOs play active role in the implementation of the ALMPs of Finland and Sweden by providing social services, mobilizing local resources and undertaking other types of activities which have created jobs for the unemployed.
Last, the findings revealed that the selected NGOs play active role in the implementation of the ALMPs of Finland and Sweden by providing voluntary work to volunteers – some of who acquire skills that can help them to find a job in the open labour market.
Originality/value
The relationship between the NGOs and the Governments of Finland and Sweden was found to be one of partnership cooperation through the local Employment Offices and the City Councils. However, Finland was found to have a more bureaucratic system than Sweden in the implementation of their ALMPs with regard to NGOs.
The main similarity between the two countries was that the implementation of ALMPs with regard to NGOs, takes place at the local level through the local Employment Offices and the City Councils.
This study concluded that although Finland and Sweden are two “Nordic countries”, the two countries slightly differ in the implementation of their ALMPs with regard to NGOs.
Showing posts with label ALMPS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ALMPS. Show all posts
Friday, 1 February 2013
Monday, 5 November 2012
Long-term Unemployment 2012
a European Employment Observatory Review
There is no abstract or summary for this document so I have decided that the best (i.e. easiest for me) way of bringing you an indication of the content is:
Table of contents
Hazel’s comment:
And if anyone can tell me how to code a nested list in HTML so that it shows as 1.1, 1.1.1 etc I will be grateful.
There is no abstract or summary for this document so I have decided that the best (i.e. easiest for me) way of bringing you an indication of the content is:
Table of contents
- Recent trends in long-term unemployment in Europe
- LTU trends in the EU in recent years
- EU policy developments connected with the reduction of LTU
- Incidence of LTU across different groups
- Impact of the crisis on LTU according to age and gender
- Impact of the crisis on LTU according to region of residence
- Impact of the crisis on LTU according to educational level
- Impact of the crisis on LTU according to immigrant or ethnic minority background and nationality
- Impact of the crisis on LTU according to job sectors/occupations
- Other factors affecting the risk of LTU 15
- Factors driving transitions into and out of LTU
- Beveridge curves and the relationship between vacancy and unemployment rates
- Structural causes of LTU
- Skills mismatches
- Geographical mismatches
- Tax and social welfare disincentives for reducing LTU
- High levels of employee protection
- Employers’ social security contributions, low wages, undeclared work
- The role of economic restructuring and its contribution to LTU
- Other factors contributing to the persistence of LTU
- Policies to prevent and tackle structural unemployment and LTU
- ALMPs
- Training measures
- Wage subsidies and employer contribution exemptions
- Job creation schemes: public works
- Prevention: early intervention approaches and profiling
- Problems identified with existing ALMPs or improvements needed
- Policies to reduce skills shortages or anticipate skill needs or re-skilling the long-term unemployed
- Unemployment benefit systems
- Other policies measures to reduce LTU
- Conclusions
Hazel’s comment:
And if anyone can tell me how to code a nested list in HTML so that it shows as 1.1, 1.1.1 etc I will be grateful.
Labels:
ALMPS,
Europe,
European_Observatory,
long-term_unemployment,
LTU,
unemployment
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)