Showing posts with label flexible_working. Show all posts
Showing posts with label flexible_working. Show all posts

Thursday, 26 October 2017

Public sector austerity cuts in Britain and the changing discourse of work–life balance

Suzan Lewis and Nicola Payne (Middlesex Univerity, UK), Deirdre Anderson (Cranfield University, UK), Clare Lyonette (The University of Warwick, UK) and Stephen Wood (University of Leicester, UK) published in Work, Employment and Society Volume 31 Issue 4 (August 2017)

Abstract

The relative importance of economic and other motives for employers to provide support for work–life balance (WLB) is debated within different literatures. However, discourses of WLB can be sensitive to changing economic contexts.

This article draws on in-depth interviews with senior human resources professionals in British public sector organizations to examine shifting discourses of WLB in an austerity context.

Three main discourses were identified:
  • WLB practices as organizationally embedded amid financial pressures;
  • WLB practices as a strategy for managing financial pressures; and
  • WLB as a personal responsibility.
Despite a discourse of mutual benefits to employee and employer underpinning all three discourses, there is a distinct shift towards greater emphasis on economic rather than institutional interests of employers during austerity, accompanied by discursive processes of fixing, stretching, shrinking and bending understandings of WLB.

The reconstructed meaning of WLB raises concerns about its continued relevance to its original espoused purpose.

Full text (PDF 19pp)


Tuesday, 13 November 2012

Family Friendly or Failing Families?

A Family Lives highlight report on progress towards implementing flexible working practices for all families

Executive summary

Introduction

Over the last decade, flexible working has been increasingly seen as an important tool for individuals to help balance work and family life. Successive governments have introduced rights to flexible working and the Coalition government is looking to increase worker rights through its Modern Workplaces agenda. 1 Currently, the majority of parents have the legal right to request flexible working and some employers have introduced extensive flexible work policies for their staff. For forward thinking employers, offering a comprehensive flexible working package is not just seen as a benefit purely for parents, but rather about engendering good business practice which supports all workers: promoting well-being, a good work atmosphere and facilitating improved efficiency, retention and performance as well as potential office overheads savings.

Flexible working for families today: laudable aims and stark realities

Recent government figures show that flexible working has become near universal in UK workplaces - with over 95% of workplaces offering at least one flexible working practice – hence it would be easy to assume that the picture of work-life balance for the UK’s families looks quite rosy. Scratch a little deeper however, and you will find that many employees will paint a very different image. Flexible working is still extremely difficult to obtain across a range of workplaces. Reconciling work and family life remains a clear challenge for a number of families; for some parents it even means making tough choices about whether to exit work all-together and this will have significant implications for their families.

Where are we now?

There is long way to go before all families have the opportunity to participate in the workplace in a way that meets both employers’ and families’ needs. This report looks at recent progress towards getting the family work/life balance right and makes an assessment of the outstanding challenges ahead. Through detailed case study research, this report finds that while many businesses claim to be both family friendly and pro-flexible working, there is a clear disparity between aims and implementation. Workplace culture and management practice remains fixed on a 9-5 model (or longer hours) and most employers continue to consider flexible working cases on an inconsistent, ad-hoc basis rather than implementing a pro-active, strategic approach to adapt working practices.

Key Findings and Recommendations

On the basis of our case study research, analysis of current flexible working policies and the recent proposals being developed by the department of Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS), this report presents a number of recommendations for both employers and policy makers with a view to improving families’ work-life balance through implementing innovative approaches to managing flexible work and by improving policy and practice.
  • Flexible working needs to become normalised in all workplaces. We urge the government to progress the key proposal in the Modern Workplaces agenda to extend the ‘right to request’ to all employees. For a number of our case studies, flexible working continues to be viewed as a parental annoyance reserved for some mothers. Whilst this perception remains, parents requesting flexible working will continue to be discriminated against in the workplace and not be able to reconcile home and work life in a way that meets their needs. For all employers there is a clear business case for promoting flexible working for all employees: flexible working reduces business costs by bringing down staff stress levels, reducing absences and can improve staff retention rates.
  • The government should strengthen and refine the statutory ‘right to request’ with a view to making the process more adaptable to family needs. We urge the government to allow employees to make a second flexible working request within a year and promote the use of flexible working trial periods. For a number of our case study examples, there is not enough awareness about the purpose and use of flexible working trials. In these cases, this directs employers to move to refuse a request in order to comply with statutory time periods. Using more flexible working trials will allow businesses and employees time to adapt to a new working framework and should be encouraged.
  • The government should look to support flexible working through proposals in the Modern Workplaces agenda to increase flexibility in taking maternity, paternity and parental leaves. Allowing some element of a phased return to work can ease the transition between full time leave and returning to work. For some employees and employers this period could serve as an informal trial of flexible working.
  • Workplaces must become more proactive rather than reactive in dealing with flexible working requests. Businesses need to integrate flexible working into their forward planning, job design and proactively train staff to manage flexible working employees. Human Resource professionals should develop extensive support structures to manage flexible working practices and show how managers can develop, monitor and motivate their flexible working staff.
  • Workplaces should look at new information technologies which promote mobile and remote working, many of which can be implemented at low or no additional cost.
  • In today’s high competitive and globalised economy, remote access and mobile technologies can significantly improve working productivity and are integral to providing a seamless customer service with limited staff capacity. Savings made through reduced fixed office costs could offset any technological investment needed.
Full text (PDF 16pp)


Monday, 5 November 2012

Schedule flexibility in hourly jobs: unanticipated consequences and promising directions

Susan J. Lambert and Julia R. Henly (University of Chicago, USA) and Anna Haley-Lock (University of Wisconsin, USA) published in Community, Work & Family Volume 15 Issue 3 (2012)

Abstract

This article considers the challenge of extending conventional models of flexibility to hourly jobs that are often structured quite differently than the salaried, professional positions for which flexibility options were originally designed.

We argue that the assumptions of job rigidity and overwork motivating existing flexibility options may not be broadly applicable across jobs in the US labor market.

We focus specifically on two types of flexibility: (1) working reduced hours and (2) varying work timing.

We first review central aspects of the US business and policy contexts that inspire our concerns, and then draw on original analyses from US census data and several examples from our comparative case-study research to explain how conventional flexibility options do not always map well onto hourly jobs, and in certain instances may disadvantage workers by undermining their ability to earn an adequate living.

We conclude with a discussion of alternative approaches to implementing flexibility in hourly jobs when hours are scarce and fluctuating rather than long and rigid.

Hazel’s comment:
The authors were looking specifically at the US labour market but it would seem to me that the conclusions would translate well to the UK labour market.
Extending flexibility is not always a good idea.



Thursday, 18 October 2012

Access to and Utilization of Flexible Work Options

an article by Tay K. McNamara (Sloan Center on Aging & Work, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA), Marcie Pitt-Catsouphes and Christina Matz-Costa (Sloan Center on Aging and Work and Graduate School of Social Work at Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA) and Melissa Brown (Graduate School of Social Work at Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA) published in Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society Volume 51 Issue 4 (October 2012)

Abstract

Many workers do not utilise the flexible work options to which they have access nor do they necessarily have access to all options officially provided by their organisations.

This study sheds light on these gaps using probit models with sample selection to predict access to and utilisation of fourteen flexible options.

The findings highlight the roles of supervisor support, occupation, and work-life culture. The influence of each of these factors on access and utilisation differs.

Hazel’s comment:
I wonder how comparable the findings of this US-based study are to the situation in the UK. I would guess that the two situations are little different.


Tuesday, 2 October 2012

Changing the way we work: The role teleworking can play in how, when and where we work

a report published by the London Chamber of Commerce in partnership with Harvey Nash in July 2012

Executive summary

Flexible working has become part of how we understand work. More and more employees request non-traditional working arrangements so that they can balance the demands of their working lives whilst maintaining a rewarding social and family life.

Most employers see flexible working as a way of helping their workers to achieve that balance. This informal approach to flexible working not only increases the probabilities of conflict amongst a company’s staff but, more importantly, it means that many businesses are not achieving its full benefits.

Flexible working can provide access to a wider talent pool, contribute to operational savings or improve a company’s output, staff retention levels and motivation. The problem is that there is not a unique implementation formula that guarantees its success.

Using the example of teleworking, also often referred to as ‘remote working’ or ‘virtual working’, this report aims to provide businesses, especially small and medium firms, with information on its potential benefits as well as negative effects, and to offer some guidance on the elements required to achieve it.

Our findings are the result of 11 interviews with London businesses that offer different forms of teleworking to their staff; some of those interviewed were teleworkers themselves, providing a unique perspective into the challenges and benefits of teleworking from the point of view of both the manager and the teleworker. The information so gathered complemented the results of a survey of 178 businesses of different sizes and sectors in the capital undertaken in February 2012.

Teleworking is widespread

Our research shows that the majority of companies offer teleworking as and when needed, although they do not usually have a formal policy on it. Workers in smaller (1 to 19 employees) and bigger companies (500+ employees) are those that generally telework the most, whilst the more senior a position one holds, the more likely one is to work remotely. Yet, this seems to be because those in higher positions tend to be more experienced and, therefore, the more comfortable companies are with their ability to work on their own.

The benefits of teleworking

Companies that offer remote work do so because technology allows them to do it (70 per cent). Better work-life balance (54 per cent) and reduced stress levels (43 per cent) seemed to be the main practical benefits of implementing teleworking, as well as increased employee satisfaction (51 per cent) and work being completed more quickly (46 per cent). On the other side of the spectrum, feelings of isolation and loneliness amongst those working from home and lack of social interaction (29 per cent), increase in the actual number of working hours (25 per cent), technological glitches (25 per cent) and deterioration in communication (24 per cent) were the most common issues reported by those offering teleworking or working remotely themselves.

Success factors

The success or failure of teleworking depends on the culture of the company. Those interviewed for this report believed that without mutual trust between the employer and the employee, and constant and open communication, teleworking cannot succeed. Firms, therefore, need to have a very clear definition of what teleworking means, what is expected from each party, and how often and what kind of positions can telework. Moreover, businesses must put in place clear and regular mechanisms of communication to avoid isolation issues, lack of information and communication failure.

Culture, management and communication

Companies also need to train their staff in essential managerial skills such as delegation and communication. If teleworking is about giving employees more responsibility, managers need to know how to manage from a distance. They also need to know how to recognise the work of those who are not always physically present and to establish continuous, open communication between their reportee(s) and themselves, and between the members of the team, regardless of their physical location.

Promoting Higher Apprenticeships in management and leadership will contribute to good practice amongst the workforce, whilst sending a strong message to employers about the importance of good management for the future of the business itself, as it helps to ensure the generational takeover of the company, and provides it with the skills required to take the firm to the next level of growth.

The effort and time spent in implementing teleworking must be seen as an investment, rather than a cost. Teleworking adds to the resilience of the business, as companies can continue to function beyond eventualities such as transport delays or extreme weather, adding to the overall competitiveness of the wider economy.

Moreover, teleworking can enhance the opportunities for expansion, as it enables growing firms to do so incrementally and without having to take on too many expenses, such as rent or employment costs, at one time. It also makes easier and more cost-effective international collaborations, as firms do not need to have offices in different countries and are more flexible to adapt to different time zones.

The importance of technology

For all this to happen, however, investment in technological infrastructure across the country is needed. If businesses are expected to work from anywhere, at any time, they need to have access to quality, high-speed broadband connection so the demand for remote working can be met without any technological limitations.

Full text: (PDF 20pp)


Friday, 10 August 2012

The fourth work-life balance employee survey

A research study by Sarah Tipping, Jenny Chanfreau, Jane Perry and Clare Tait (NATCEN) published by BIS (Department for Business Innovation & Skills) in its Employment Relations Research Series

About the study

The Work-Life Balance Study (WLBS) is a major study conducted on behalf of the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS).

First carried out in 2000, the 2011 study is the fourth in the series of these surveys that provide facts and figures about people's experience of employment – in particular the use and awareness of work-life balance practices.

We found:
  • Employees, on the whole, were aware of their right to work flexibly.
  • This was particularly true of parents and parents of young children.
  • Those working flexibly were more likely to work longer hours.
Read further findings

Read the full report

Potential policy impact

The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills will use the findings of the research to track changes in employment practices and in attitudes over time, and to assess the impact of new legislation and employers’ flexible working practices on different groups of the population.

Method

Interviews for this study are conducted by telephone and last around 20 minutes. The telephone numbers have been obtained through a method called random digit dialling where telephone numbers are randomly selected from all possible telephone numbers in Great Britain. Once a number has been selected we cannot select another one instead.


Tuesday, 17 July 2012

Organisational approaches to flexible working: Perspectives of equality and diversity managers in the UK

an article by Jean Gardiner and Jennifer Tomlinson (Leeds University Business School, University of Leeds) published in Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal Volume 28 Issue 8 (2012)

Abstract

Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to, first, explore flexible working as an important but under-researched dimension of equality and diversity (E&D) and, second, contribute to employment relations debates by exploring organisational perspectives on flexible working and how these connect with business strategies and the regulatory context.
Design/methodology/approach
In depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 E&D managers in ten public and private sector organisations. Interviews explored the role of E&D managers in the construction of flexible working arrangements (FWAs) and drivers underpinning them.
Findings
Flexible working was most evident as a significant field of E&D practice where E&D was linked into business strategy and was well resourced. The key roles of E&D managers in relation to FWAs were policy innovation and monitoring. Four organisational rationales for FWAs were identified from the data. These were FWA constructed as: an individual employee benefit; a means of improving operational effectiveness; an integral part of organisational strategy; and as a means of addressing structural social inequalities.
Research limitations/implications
While the sample is small, the research is of value to both researchers and policy makers, offering insights on an under-researched area of E&D policy and practice.
Practical implications
This paper outlines different rationales for flexible working and shows how some organisations are able to develop flexible working policies that are more equitable and effective than other organisations.
Originality/value
The originality lies in the use of E&D managers as informants of organisational approaches to FWAs, which to date has been under-researched in terms of its connection with E&D policy and practice.


Tuesday, 26 June 2012

Flexible friends? Flexible working time arrangements, blurred work-life boundaries and friendship

an article by Vivi Bach Pedersen (Aarhus University, Denmark) and Suzan Lewis (Middlesex University Business School, UK) published in Work, Employment & Society Volume 26 Number 3 (June 2012)

Abstract

The changing nature and demands of work raise concerns about how workers can find time for activities such as friendship and leisure, which are important for well-being.

This article brings friendship into the work-life debate by exploring how individuals do friendship in a period characterized by time dilemmas, blurred work-life boundaries and increased employer- and employee-led flexible working. Interviews with employees selected according to their working time structures were supplemented by time-use diaries.

Findings indicate that despite various constraints, participants found strategies for making time for friendship by blurring boundaries between friends and family and between friends and work. However, the impacts of flexible working time structures were complex and double-edged.


Wednesday, 4 April 2012

Flexicurity under the spotlight

via Eurofound News March 2012

Flexicurity, the concept of balancing flexibility – as sought mainly by employers – with security – as demanded mainly by employees – became a popular policy approach during periods of growth in the EU pre-recession.

Recent Eurofound research has been examining how flexicurity is faring in economically difficult times, where it has become much more difficult to provide security and where all the flexibility in the world will not help companies if there is no demand for their products.

Interestingly, the findings reveal that, the current economic climate notwithstanding, there are many public support instruments in use across Europe that support flexicurity. They may not be explicitly labelled flexicurity measures, but they do attempt to balance the twin aspects of flexibility and security.

Eurofound’s research report, The second phase of flexicurity, will be [now has been] launched in Brussels on 20 March, at a specially convened social partners’ lunch debate on the subject of flexicurity.

At the same event, Eurofound will also present its latest edition of Foundation Findings, on the same subject, which draws on upcoming research on flexicurity at the company level.

Both reports are part of the resource pack on flexicurity


Thursday, 31 March 2011

Health and work: a difficult relationship

Issue 9 (February 2011) of Foundation Focus looks at the relationship between work and health, using first findings from Eurofound’s fifth European Working Conditions Survey which was launched on 16 and 17 November 2010 under the Belgian EU presidency. With the additional support of the European Commission, the two-day conference brought together high-level policymakers and decision makers in the field to discuss the future of working conditions across Europe.


Hazel’s comment:
I would advise that you print the articles that you want to read – unless you are adept at reading three columns on screen (I’m certainly not). Several of the pieces are worth reading even where my reaction was “this is obvious” as sometimes the obvious does need to be restated.