Showing posts with label finance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label finance. Show all posts

Saturday, 19 October 2019

"The People's Money": A crisp, simple, thorough explanation of how government spending is paid for

a post by Cory Doctorow for the Boing Boing blog



Modern Monetary Theory is an economic paradigm that treats money as a utility that governments issue and tax in order to mobilize resources needed to provide the services that the public wants; it explains why some kinds of government spending leads to inflation while other kinds do not, and how sovereign states use different levers to control inflation, even when they're spending extraordinary sums, as in WWII.

MMT is key to understanding how bold and vital social programs -- from Medicare for All to a federal jobs guarantee to the Green New Deal -- can be enacted, and why austerity and its absurd comparisons between sovereign nations' spending and household or small business budgets are cruelty dressed up as prudence.

Continue reading



Thursday, 15 August 2019

Modelling impact of economic and demographic factors on personal saving rate in the euro area

an article by Renáta Pitoňáková (Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia) published in International Journal of Trade and Global Markets Volume 12 Number 3/4 (2019)

Abstract

The decision of economic subjects whether to consume or save is determined by different economic, monetary, and demographic factors.

The paper focuses upon personal saving rate of the whole euro area taking into account economic and demographic aspects. The modelling uses quarterly data within 2005 Q1-2017 Q2.

The results indicate a negative relation between savings and dependency ratio of elderly suggesting savings for retirement. Government spending pushes savings up, inflation causes dissaving.

Implications are for governing bodies directing measures for investment and consumption, for pension systems when managing sustainability of pension funds due to population ageing and for households when deciding about savings or consumption.


Tuesday, 12 March 2019

How finance affects income inequality

a column by Michael Brei, Giovanni Ferri and Leonardo Gambacorta for VOX: CEPR’s Policy Portal

There is mounting evidence that income inequality and disparities in wealth have been rising in advanced economies in the recent decades.

Using data on advanced and emerging economies, this column investigates the link between an economy's financial structure – that is, the mix of bank-provided versus market-provided funds – and income inequality. Results show that the relationship is not monotonic.

More finance reduces income inequality up to a point, but beyond that point inequality rises, especially if finance is expanded via market-based financing.

Continue reading


Sunday, 8 April 2018

Growth and Inequality Effects of Decades of Financial Transformation in OECD Countries

an article by Boris Cournède and Catherine L. Mann (OECD Economics Department, Paris, France) published in Comparative Economic Studies Volume 60 Issue 1 (March 2018)

Abstract

Finance has massively expanded and deeply changed across OECD countries over the past 50 years. Rapid growth of finance has been accompanied by a debt shift away from business towards household credit and, after 2000, a withering of equity capital.

Econometric investigations indicate that these changes have contributed to slowing down potential growth.

In OECD countries, higher credit/GDP ratios imply slower trend growth, especially when lending goes to households; by contrast, additional stockmarket funding boosts growth.

Moreover, these trends have contributed to widening inequalities.

There is a case for policymakers to focus on macro-prudential policy tools that optimise growth-stability trade-offs.

JEL Classification: D14, D63, G1, G2


Monday, 22 April 2013

Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin (2013 Q1)

With apologies for the lateness. I seem to have been a bit lax in the “fetching” department (i.e. those publications that do not have a reliable feed have to retrieved according to my sources list which I have been ignoring lately).

Executive summary

Recent economic and financial developments (pages 5–18)

Markets and operations. This article reviews developments in financial markets and the Bank’s official operations in the period between the previous Bulletin and 22 February 2013. Market sentiment improved significantly, reflecting a continued positive response to central bank policy measures adopted by both the European Central Bank and the Federal Reserve during the 2012 Q4 review period. Confidence was buoyed further in the New Year as policymakers in the United States reached an agreement to avert the approaching ‘fiscal cliff’. In response to these developments, there was an increase in investors’ willingness to bear risk, providing support to a broad range of assets and prompting some significant adjustments in exchange rates. The article also describes a prospective new tool for reducing counterparty credit risk exposures.

Research and analysis (pages 19–77)

Changes to the Bank of England (by Emma Murphy and Stephen Senior).
In April 2013, a new regulatory framework for the UK financial sector will come into force, which will result in the Bank of England gaining significant new responsibilities. This article gives an overview of the changes that are happening to the Bank, including the creation of the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) and the Financial Policy Committee (FPC), and new responsibilities in relation to financial market infrastructures. The PRA, as part of the Bank, will be responsible for the microprudential regulation of deposit-takers, insurers and major investment firms. It will promote the safety and soundness of these firms, focusing on the adverse effects that they can have on the stability of the financial system; and contribute to ensuring that insurance policyholders are appropriately protected. The FPC, which has operated in interim form since 2011, will be formally charged with identifying, monitoring and taking action to remove or reduce risks to the resilience of the financial system as a whole. The Bank will also become responsible for regulation of certain post-trade market infrastructures, including central counterparties and securities settlement systems. The article also looks at the important revised governance processes that are being put in place to ensure that the Bank carries out its new responsibilities effectively and transparently and is fully accountable to Parliament and the public.

The profile of cash transfers between the Asset Purchase Facility and Her Majesty’s Treasury (by Nick McLaren and Tom Smith).
The Bank of England Asset Purchase Facility Fund Limited (APF) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank of England, used to make purchases of public and private sector assets for monetary policy purposes. It is fully indemnified by Her Majesty’s Treasury (HMT). Initially, it was envisaged that payments due under the indemnity would be settled when the asset purchase scheme ended. But on 9 November 2012 it was agreed to alter this arrangement and establish a process for ongoing quarterly transfers between the APF and HMT. This article explains how the possible size of the transfers varies depending on a number of uncertain factors, including the future path of Bank Rate, and the price at which the assets held by the APF are ultimately sold. While the initial transfers are from the APF to HMT, it is likely that they will be offset by payments in the opposite direction in the future. But the ultimate net amount that will be transferred is uncertain, and a wide range of outcomes is possible.

Private equity and financial stability (by David Gregory).
In the mid-2000s, there was a dramatic increase in acquisitions of UK companies by private equity funds. The leverage on these buyouts, especially the larger ones, was high. The increased indebtedness of such companies could make the corporate sector more susceptible to default, posing a risk to the stability of the financial system in the United Kingdom. Moreover, this risk is compounded by the need for companies to refinance debt maturing over the next few years in an environment of much tighter credit conditions. Since the crisis began, there has been some evidence of loans to private equity sponsored firms performing poorly but a complete picture will not become clear until more investments have been exited by private equity funds. From a macroprudential policy perspective it will be important to monitor the use of debt in acquisitions in the future. But there is also potentially a role for private equity to play in promoting recovery in a downswing, in particular at the current juncture, by restructuring companies in difficulty.

Commercial property and financial stability (by James Benford and Oliver Burrows).
The commercial property market played a key role in the recent financial crisis in the United Kingdom. A rapid build-up of debt tied to commercial property investments pre-crisis supported a boom in prices. The consequent bust led to a sharp rise in non-performing loans. This article documents some of the main developments in the commercial property market and explores the behaviour of its key players: occupiers of property, investors and lenders. It finds that the structure of the market evolved significantly during the boom period and that an increase in the use of leverage and maturity mismatch contributed to both the rise in prices and the subsequent fall. Going forward, it will be important to consider these factors when assessing the risks that the commercial property market can pose to the stability of the financial system. The new Financial Policy Committee will be alert to these risks and deploy tools to counteract them, where necessary, in order to protect financial stability.

The Agents’ company visit scores (by Jon Relleen, David Copple, Matthew Corder and Nicholas Fawcett).
The Bank’s Agents collect economic intelligence from the business community around the United Kingdom. Since 2007, the Bank’s Agents have been assigning company visit scores (CVS) based on the 5,500 bilateral meetings that they have with individual UK firms every year. The CVS have three attributes that make them useful for analysis. First, they are very timely. Second, firm-level data allow a consideration of the differences in business conditions across companies and sectors. And third, the scores cover some variables where official data are unavailable. This article introduces the CVS data set. It explains how they are assigned before going on to show some initial examples of how they have been used for internal analysis at the Bank, including analysis of trends in employment and capacity utilisation. The Bank places great importance on the confidential nature of discussions between Agents and company contacts — the analysis using the CVS presented in this article is based on aggregated and anonymised data.

The Bank of England Bank Liabilities Survey (by Venetia Bell, Nick Butt and James Talbot). The Bank of England began conducting a survey of banks’ liabilities in 2012. Developments in banks’ liabilities — retail and wholesale funding and capital — can have a substantial impact on credit conditions. The Bank already uses data and intelligence from discussions with market participants to inform its analysis of such developments. But there are benefits from a regular survey, which provides consistent, comparable data; information on the factors affecting developments in liabilities; as well as the reporting of institutions’ expectations of future developments. This new survey will also supplement the data collected on the asset side of bank balance sheets by the Bank of England’s Credit Conditions Survey, which was launched in 2007. The first results of the Bank Liabilities Survey will be published on 26 March 2013. This article explores the reasons for launching this new survey and describes its design and coverage, including details of the questions asked.

Report (pages 79–82)

Monetary Policy Roundtable
This edition also contains a summary of the main points made by participants at the most recent Monetary Policy Roundtable hosted by the Bank of England and the Centre for Economic Policy Research, on 11 December 2012.

Research work published by the Bank is intended to contribute to debate, and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Bank, MPC or FPC members.

Full text (PDF 96pp)