The role of stable accommodation in reducing recidivism: what does the evidence tell us?

an article by Chris O’Leary (Based at King's College London, UK) published in Safer Communities Volume 12 Issue 1 (2013)

Abstract

Purpose
This paper aims to review the available evidence on the role of stable accommodation in reducing the risk of recidivism. It seeks to answer questions about the nature and extent of such a role, whether stable accommodation on its own plays a role or as part of an overall programme, and what the implications arising from the current evidence are for policy makers and practitioners.
Design/methodology/approach
The research strategy consisted of a number of steps. First, existing systematic reviews in the field were reviewed to identity relevant evidence. Following this, a standard search of the literature was undertaken to identity potential research for further consideration. Articles and books identified were subject to a three-part test to determine relevance and robustness of method.
Findings
The paper suggests that the evidence base is less than clear about the role of stable accommodation in reducing risk of recidivism. The extant literature can be classified as two types; the first utilises robust methods but fails to single out accommodation as a single intervention. The second often focuses on stable accommodation but fails to use Randomised Controlled Trial or quasi-experimental methods.
Research limitations/implications
Taken as a whole, it is clear that stable accommodation has a potential role in programmes aimed at reducing recidivism. The nature of that role, the causal mechanisms underlying that role and the methods used to increase stability of accommodation are not clear from the literature.
Originality/value
The paper provides a means of classifying the extant literature and assesses this literature in terms of its methodological robustness.

---

Offenders, welfare reforms and housing

an article by Jo Linney (Based at Linney Associates, Ware, UK) published in Safer Communities Volume 12 Issue 1 (2013)

Abstract

Purpose
The aim of the article is to encourage debate, monitoring and further research into the effects of welfare reform, and related policies, in particular on offenders, housing and recidivism and the savings made through reforms versus the potential cost of increased recidivism.
Design/methodology/approach
The article is a review of legislative, consultation and available statistical documentation and available research on housing benefit shared accommodation rate.
Findings
The implementation of welfare reforms is ongoing; suitable stable accommodation has been identified as a key element in effective resettlement.
Research limitations/implications
There is little research on the combined impact of government budgetary constraints in relation to housing and recidivism and there is a need for further research, monitoring and discussion to monitor the future situation.
Practical implications
Monitoring by agencies and further research is required.
Social implications
There is potential for increased recidivism due to the availability of secure suitable accommodation.
Originality/value
There has been little discussion of the impact of welfare reforms on access to suitable secure housing and recidivism this article poses the questions.

---