Showing posts with label non-participation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label non-participation. Show all posts

Monday, 3 March 2014

Physical activity barriers in the workplace: An exploration of factors contributing to non-participation in a UK workplace physical activity intervention

an article by Sarah Edmunds, (Department of Psychology, University of Westminster, UK) and Louise Hurst and Kate Harvey, (Centre for Workplace Health, St Mary's University College, Twickenham, UK) published in International Journal of Workplace Health and Management Volume 6 Issue 3 (2013)

Abstract

Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to explore factors contributing to non-participation in a workplace physical activity (PA) intervention in a large UK call centre.

Design/methodology/approach
In total, 16 inactive individuals (nine male/seven female), aged 27±9 years, who had not taken part in the intervention were interviewed to explore their perceptions of PA, the intervention and factors which contributed to their non-participation. Transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis.

Findings
Six superordinate themes were identified: self-efficacy for exercise; attitudes towards PA; lack of time and energy; facilities and the physical environment; response to the PA programme and PA culture. Barriers occurred at multiple levels of influence, and support the use of ecological or multilevel models to help guide future programme design/delivery.

Research limitations/implications
The 16 participants were not selected to be representative of the workplace gender or structure. Future intentions relating to PA participation were not considered and participants may have withheld negative opinions about the workplace or intervention despite use of an external researcher.

Practical implications
In this group of employees education about the importance of PA for young adults and providing opportunities to gain social benefits from PA would increase perceived benefits and reduce perceived costs of PA. Workplace cultural norms with respect to PA must also be addressed to create a shift in PA participation.

Originality/value
Employees’ reasons for non-participation in workplace interventions remain poorly understood and infrequently studied. The study considers a relatively under-studied population of employed young adults, providing practical recommendations for future interventions.


Wednesday, 6 March 2013

Against disengagement: non-participation as an object of governance

an article by Ross Fergusson (Open University, Milton Keynes, UK) published in Research in Post-Compulsory Education Volume 18 Issue 1-2 (2013)

Abstract

The discourse of disengagement has achieved ascendancy just as young people’s employment prospects have declined – in many countries to crisis levels.

Conceptualising and interpreting young people’s non-participation in dominant modes of education, training and employment has been a preoccupation of academics, policy-makers and journalists.

This paper offers a critical analysis of the discourse of disengagement.

It queries the primacy of participation as the dominant policy response to mass youth unemployment, identifies some paradoxes of this policy priority, and locates them within a political-economic analysis of youth unemployment.

It proposes a view of prevailing policy responses as a mode of governance of problematised populations of young ‘non-participants’.

By juxtaposing two ostensibly incompatible analytical frameworks, the paper draws attention to some potentially illuminating tensions between materialist and governmentalist analyses of dominant policy responses to ‘disengagement’, and considers how these might be exploited in researching and reconceptualising non-participation.