Showing posts with label competition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label competition. Show all posts

Friday, 11 October 2019

Adversarial Interoperability

a post by Cory Doctorow for the Boing Boing blog



“Interoperability” is the act of making a new product or service work with an existing product or service: modern civilization depends on the standards and practices that allow you to put any dish into a dishwasher or any USB charger into any car’s cigarette lighter.

But interoperability is just the ante. For a really competitive, innovative, dynamic marketplace, you need adversarial interoperability: that’s when you create a new product or service that plugs into the existing ones without the permission of the companies that make them. Think of third-party printer ink, alternative app stores, or independent repair shops that use compatible parts from rival manufacturers to fix your car or your phone or your tractor.

(Crossposted from EFF Deeplinks)

Continue reading


Wednesday, 26 June 2019

EU competition policy should not be sacrificed but trade policy should be strengthened

a column by Sébastien Jean, Anne Perrot and Thomas Philippon for VOX: CEPR’s Policy Portal

Some policymakers believe that EU competition policy prevents the emergence of industrial champions.

The column argues that Europe’s competition policy has successfully contained the rise in concentration and excess profits, and the EU should not follow the US in weakening its approach. Instead, the EU needs to strengthen its trade policy to be more assertive on reciprocity in market access and control of industrial subsidies.

Continue reading


Monday, 4 March 2019

Europe's transformation after Gutenberg: the impact of new media and competition

an article by Jeremiah Dittmar published in Centrepiece Volume 24 Issue 1 (Spring 2019)
Paper No CEPCP544

Revolutionary changes in information technology promise to reshape society. Jeremiah Dittmar explores the impact of the printing press and the new forms of competition that accompanied its introduction – on book prices, scientists’ pay, the Protestant Reformation and the spread of radical ideas that changed how Europeans did business.

Full text (PDF 6pp)


Tuesday, 9 October 2018

When I Stopped Competing, I Set Myself Free

a post by Sara Fabian for the Tiny Buddha blog


“With nothing to compare yourself to, aren’t you perfect?” ~Byron Katie

I have never liked competition. Every time I compete, I feel pressured and disconnected from others. I love harmony, peace, collaboration, and win-win situations, kind of like “me happy, you happy.” I don’t need to watch another person lose the game to feel good about myself. I don't need to dominate or put someone else down in order to feel superior and worthy.

In some cultures, competing is perceived as a sign of ambition, power, and strength. Most of us grew up hearing constant comparisons, which turned into a habit during our adult lives:

“Do I look better than her? I want to be slimmer.”

“How much is he earning? I want more.”

“Where does she live? I want a house at least that size.”

And so on…

Continue reading


Tuesday, 15 May 2018

A genie in a bottle: Inflation, globalisation, and competition

a column by Dan Andrews, Peter Gal and William Witheridge for VOX: CEPR’s Policy Portal

Low inflation at the same time as rising global competition has led to a debate on the importance of globalisation for domestic inflation. This column suggests that greater participation in global value chains has placed downward pressure on inflation. The current higher level of global value chain integration may also dampen inflation by accentuating the impact of global economic slack on domestic inflation. There is a risk that stalling globalisation since the crisis, coupled with stronger aggregate demand and declining market contestability, could lead to inflationary pressures in the medium term.

Continue reading




Thursday, 16 March 2017

Competitive urbanism and the limits to smart city innovation: The UK Future Cities initiative

an article by Nick Taylor Buck and Aidan While (University of Sheffield, UK) published in Urban Studies Volume 54 Issue 2 (February 2017)

Abstract

The technological vision of smart urbanism has been promoted as a silver bullet for urban problems and a major market opportunity. The search is on for firms and governments to find effective and transferable demonstrations of advanced urban technology.

This paper examines initiatives by the UK national government to facilitate urban technological innovation through a range of strategies, particularly the TSB Future Cities Demonstrator Competition.

This case study is used to explore opportunities and tensions in the practical realisation of the smart city imaginary. Tensions are shown to be partly about the conjectural nature of the smart city debate.

Attention is also drawn to weakened capacity of urban governments to control their infrastructural destiny and also constraints on the ability of the public and private sectors to innovate.

The paper contributes to smart city debates by providing further evidence of the difficulties in substantiating the smart city imaginary.

Full text (PDF)


Monday, 11 February 2013

Policy Diffusion and Policy Transfer in Comparative Welfare State Research

an article by Herbert Obinger (University of Bremen, Germany and University of Southern Denmark) and Carina Schmitt and Peter Starke (University of Bremen, Germany) published in Social Policy & Administration Volume 47 Issue 1 (February 2013)

Abstract

For many years, comparative welfare state research has followed a ‘methodological nationalism’ in the sense that countries were treated as independent units. Yet the recent ‘spatial turn’ in comparative politics has also influenced welfare state research.

For some years now, the field has been witnessing a growing interest in questions about interdependencies and policy diffusion between countries.

In this article, we provide a structured overview of the state of the art in the policy diffusion and transfer literature that deals specifically with social policy. We present and critically evaluate existing theoretical concepts and quantitative and qualitative methodological approaches that enable the analysis of interdependencies between countries.

Moreover, we summarise the empirical findings of quantitative and qualitative studies on the diffusion and transfer of social policy, from some pioneering studies to the latest findings. Against this background we point out what we believe to be promising avenues for future research.

We focus on five areas:
  • theoretical work on the mechanisms underlying diffusion and transfer;
  • methodological approaches;
  • the impact of domestic institutions and policy characteristics on social policy diffusion and transfer;
  • programme-specific dynamics; and
  • the systematic combination of horizontal and vertical interdependencies.