Tuesday, 15 November 2016

Yet more trivia for you, most of which is not trivial

Man, weeping
History is full of sorrowful knights, sobbing monks and weeping lovers – what happened to the noble art of the manly cry?
via Arts & Letters Daily: Sandra Newman in aeon
One of our most firmly entrenched ideas of masculinity is that men don’t cry. Although he might shed a discreet tear at a funeral, and it’s acceptable for him to well up when he slams his fingers in a car door, a real man is expected to quickly regain control. Sobbing openly is strictly for girls.
This isn’t just a social expectation; it’s a scientific fact. All the research to date finds that women cry significantly more than men. A meta-study by the German Society of Ophthalmology in 2009 found that women weep, on average, five times as often, and almost twice as long per episode. The discrepancy is such a commonplace, we tend to assume it’s biologically hard-wired; that, whether you like it or not, this is one gender difference that isn’t going away.
But actually, the gender gap in crying seems to be a recent development. Historical and literary evidence suggests that, in the past, not only did men cry in public, but no one saw it as feminine or shameful. In fact, male weeping was regarded as normal in almost every part of the world for most of recorded history.
Continue reading

===================================
Bloodshed and the birth of the modern Middle East
via 3 Quarks Daily: Mark Mazower at the Financial Times
Before the first world war, the term “Middle East” was virtually unknown. The Ottoman empire had ruled for centuries over the lands from the Sahara to Persia but did not refer to them as part of a single region. Coined in the mid-19th century, the phrase became popular only in the mid-20th. It reflected the growing popularity of geopolitical thinking as well as the strategic anxieties of the rivalrous great powers, and its spread was a sign of growing European meddling in the destiny of the Arab-speaking peoples.
Continue reading

===================================
Dmitri Mendeleev's lost elements
via OUP Blog by Marco Fontani, Mariagrazia Costa and Mary Virginia Orna
Dmitri Mendeleev believed he was a great scientist and indeed he was. He was not actually recognized as such until his periodic table achieved worldwide diffusion and began to appear in textbooks of general chemistry and in other major publications. When Mendeleev died in February 1907, the periodic table was established well enough to stand on its own and perpetuate his name for upcoming generations of chemists.
Continue reading

===================================
Renoir sucks – or does he?
via Boing Boing by Rob Beschizza
renoir
Even Pierre-Auguste Renoir, the long-dead impressionist painter, cannot escape the internet's disdain for pretty things that are also smarmy.
Continue reading

===================================
George Burroughs: Salem's perfect witch
via OUP Blog by Emerson W. Baker
On 19 August 1692, George Burroughs stood on the ladder and calmly made a perfect recitation of the Lord’s Prayer. Some in the large crowd of observers were moved to tears, so much so that it seemed the proceedings might come to a halt. But Reverend Burroughs had uttered his last words. He was soon “turned off” the ladder, hanged to death for the high crime of witchcraft. After the execution, Reverend Cotton Mather, who had been watching the proceedings from horseback, acted quickly to calm the restless multitude. He reminded them among other things “that the Devil has often been transformed into an Angel of Light” – that despite his pious words and demeanour, Burroughs had been the leader of Satan’s war against New England. Thus assured, the executions would continue. Five people would die that day, one of most dramatic and important in the course of the Salem witch trials. For the audience on 19 August realised that if a Puritan minister could hang for witchcraft, then no one was safe. Their tears and protests were the beginning of the public opposition that would eventually bring the trials to an end. Unfortunately, by the time that happened, nineteen people had been executed, one pressed to death, and five perished in the wretched squalor of the Salem and Boston jails.
Continue reading

===================================
16 Old-School Internet Acronyms: How Many Can You Recognize?
via Stephen's Lighthouse: Gretchen McCulloch on Mental Floss
Try for yourself here
I got none of them although recognised several of them when told the answer.

===================================
The Evolution of Language: When is a Phone not a Phone?
via Scholarly Kitchen by David Crotty
As the old joke goes, when is a door not a door? Puns aside, technology continues to evolve at a pace so rapid that it’s difficult for language, which moves slower, to keep up. We still “dial” a phone, despite phones not having rotary dials for decades.
Continue reading

===================================
Interview with Queen
via Boing Boing by David Pescovitz
1*hyE18fUNwOeIO-J2YNCEHw
Over at Cuepoint, Alan Light talks to Brian May and Roger Taylor of Queen about their signature operatic rock sound, the band's chemistry, and the final days of Freddie Mercury.
Continue reading

===================================
A voyage around 'Las Meninas'
via 3 Quarks Daily: Simon Schama in Financial Times
Diego Velázquez’s 1656 painting, ‘Las Meninas’
Jacobs, one of the great non-fiction writers of this and the last century, is usually found shelved under “travel writing”, which is the truth but certainly not the whole truth, any more than it adequately describes the books of Bruce Chatwin or Patrick Leigh Fermor. Wherever they happened to go, the travel all these writers undertook was essentially a journey through themselves, and the reports they made drew their power from the geography of their memories. It was their imaginations that roamed as much as their boats or mules.
Continue reading



No comments: