Showing posts with label vocational_interests. Show all posts
Showing posts with label vocational_interests. Show all posts

Thursday, 30 August 2012

A multi-method approach to studying the relationship between character strengths and vocational interests in adolescents

an article by René T. Proyer, Nicole Sidler, Marco Weber and Willibald Ruch (affiliation(s) not provided) published in International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance Volume 12 Issue 2 (July 2012)

Abstract

The relationship between character strengths and vocational interests was tested.

In an online study, 197 thirteen to eighteen year-olds completed a questionnaire measuring character strengths and a multi-method measure for interests (questionnaire, nonverbal test, and objective personality tests).

The main findings were that intellectual strengths yielded primarily relations with investigative and artistic interests. Social interests demonstrated relations with strengths of transcendence and other-directed strengths and enterprising interests with leadership strengths.

The implications of the findings for practice are highlighted.


Tuesday, 19 May 2009

Where Have the Investigative Occupations Gone? Perceptions and Misperceptions of Occupations

an article by Adi Amit and Lilach Sagiv (The Hebrew University of Jerusalem) in Journal of Career Assessment Volume 17 Number 2 (2009)

Abstract
How do people perceive occupations? Three empirical studies examined whether occupations are perceived in accordance with Holland's RIASEC model. The studies varied in measures (reported preferences, similarity judgments) and participants (university students, working adults, and university professors). Taken together, the findings indicate that perceptions of occupations partially comply with Holland's model: All four samples perceived the realistic, artistic, social, enterprising, and conventional as distinct environments (with the latter two intermixed). Moreover, the order of these environments is congruent with Holland's RIASEC order. The most notable deviation from the RIASEC model was the consistent misperception of the investigative work environment. Participants in all three studies overlooked the commonalities among investigative occupations, instead perceiving these occupations in terms of their content (as expressed by their second or third Holland letter code). Implications for vocational research, career counseling, and selection processes are discussed.