a column by Yi Huang, Chen Lin, Sibo Liu, Heiwai Tang for VOX: CEPR’s Policy Portal
Recent studies have found that US tariffs on China have led to a significant welfare loss and significant increases in consumer prices in the US.
This column, taken from a recent Vox eBook, studies firms’ equity market responses to the various tariff announcements by the US and Chinese governments in 2018 and 2019. The responses demonstrate that the structure of US–China trade is much more complex than the simplistic view of global trade that prompted the trade war, and that the winners and losers in the war depend on firms’ positioning in, and exposure to, the global value chains shared by the two countries.
Continue reading
Showing posts with label supply_chains. Show all posts
Showing posts with label supply_chains. Show all posts
Wednesday, 10 July 2019
Tuesday, 14 August 2018
Paying for Free Delivery: Dependent Self-Employment as a Measure of Precarity in Parcel Delivery
an article by Sian Moore (University of Greenwich, UK) and Kirsty Newsome (University of Sheffield, UK) published in Work, Employment and Society Volume 32 Issue 3 (June 2018)
Abstract
This article explores supply chain pressures in parcel delivery and how the drive to contain costs to ‘preserve value in motion’, including the costs of failed delivery, underpins contractual differentiation.
It focuses on owner-drivers and home couriers paid by delivery.
It considers precarity through the lens of the labour process, while locating it within the supply chain, political economy and ‘instituted economic process’ that define it. Focus on the labour process shows how ‘self-employment’ is used to remove so-called ‘unproductive’ time from the remit of paid labour.
Using Smith’s concept of double indeterminacy the article captures the dynamic relationship between those on standard and non-standard contracts and interdependency of effort power and mobility power. It exposes the apparent mobility and autonomy of dependent self-employed drivers while suggesting that their presence, alongside the increased use of technology, reconfigures the work-effort bargain across contractual status.
Abstract
This article explores supply chain pressures in parcel delivery and how the drive to contain costs to ‘preserve value in motion’, including the costs of failed delivery, underpins contractual differentiation.
It focuses on owner-drivers and home couriers paid by delivery.
It considers precarity through the lens of the labour process, while locating it within the supply chain, political economy and ‘instituted economic process’ that define it. Focus on the labour process shows how ‘self-employment’ is used to remove so-called ‘unproductive’ time from the remit of paid labour.
Using Smith’s concept of double indeterminacy the article captures the dynamic relationship between those on standard and non-standard contracts and interdependency of effort power and mobility power. It exposes the apparent mobility and autonomy of dependent self-employed drivers while suggesting that their presence, alongside the increased use of technology, reconfigures the work-effort bargain across contractual status.
Labels:
dualisation,
logistics,
precarity,
self-employment,
supply_chains
Monday, 13 August 2018
Paying for Free Delivery: Dependent Self-Employment as a Measure of Precarity in Parcel Delivery
an article by Sian Moore (University of Greenwich, UK) and Kirsty Newsome (University of Sheffield, UK) published in Work, Employment and Society Volume 32 Issue 3 (June 2018)
Abstract
This article explores supply chain pressures in parcel delivery and how the drive to contain costs to ‘preserve value in motion’, including the costs of failed delivery, underpins contractual differentiation.
It focuses on owner-drivers and home couriers paid by delivery.
It considers precarity through the lens of the labour process, while locating it within the supply chain, political economy and ‘instituted economic process’ that define it.
Focus on the labour process shows how ‘self-employment’ is used to remove so-called ‘unproductive’ time from the remit of paid labour. Using Smith’s concept of double indeterminacy the article captures the dynamic relationship between those on standard and non-standard contracts and interdependency of effort power and mobility power.
It exposes the apparent mobility and autonomy of dependent self-employed drivers while suggesting that their presence, alongside the increased use of technology, reconfigures the work-effort bargain across contractual status.
Abstract
This article explores supply chain pressures in parcel delivery and how the drive to contain costs to ‘preserve value in motion’, including the costs of failed delivery, underpins contractual differentiation.
It focuses on owner-drivers and home couriers paid by delivery.
It considers precarity through the lens of the labour process, while locating it within the supply chain, political economy and ‘instituted economic process’ that define it.
Focus on the labour process shows how ‘self-employment’ is used to remove so-called ‘unproductive’ time from the remit of paid labour. Using Smith’s concept of double indeterminacy the article captures the dynamic relationship between those on standard and non-standard contracts and interdependency of effort power and mobility power.
It exposes the apparent mobility and autonomy of dependent self-employed drivers while suggesting that their presence, alongside the increased use of technology, reconfigures the work-effort bargain across contractual status.
Labels:
dualisation,
logistics,
precarity,
self-employment,
supply_chains
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)