Showing posts with label stress_at_work. Show all posts
Showing posts with label stress_at_work. Show all posts

Wednesday, 8 November 2017

Antecedents and consequences of positive emotions in the workplace

an article by Avas Sahu (Ispat Bhawan Durgapur Steel Plant, West Bengal, India) and Kailash B.L. Srivastava (Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, West Bengal, India) published in International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion Volume 8 Number 2 (2017)

Abstract

This paper examined the relationship of social relations, role characteristics; transformational leadership and group emotions with positive individual emotions, its consequences on job satisfaction, stress, work motivation, individual performance and the mediating effect of positive emotions on the relationship of antecedent and outcome variables.

The data were collected from 406 respondents from six organisations across hierarchy. The results suggested that social relations, transformational leadership and group emotions significantly predicted positive emotions, but role conflict and role ambiguity negatively predicted positive emotions.

Positive emotions significantly predicted job satisfaction, work motivation and individual performance, but negatively predicted stress. Positive emotions also mediated the relationship between antecedent and outcome variables. The study contributes to the literature by identifying the role of certain individual and group level factors in building positive emotions and its impact on employee performance, motivation and satisfaction.

The implications of the study are discussed.


Thursday, 19 January 2017

Sexual Orientation, Income, and Stress at Work

Benjamin Cerf (U.S., Census Bureau, Washington, DC) published in Industrial Relations: a journal of economy and society Volume 55, Issue 4 (October 2016)

Abstract

I present a model explaining recent findings that partnered gay men earn less than partnered straight men while partnered lesbian women earn more than partnered straight women.

In an environment with compensating differentials and a gender gap in potential income, an income effect leads partnered gay men to choose jobs with lower income and higher amenities than partnered straight men. The same mechanism generates similarly reasoned predictions about income and amenities for women and single people.

Canadian data on stressfulness of one’s working environment support these predictions.