an article by Wonhyung Lee (University at Albany, State University of New York, USA) and Linda Plitt Donaldson (Catholic University of America, Washington D.C., USA) published in Journal of Poverty Volume 22 Issue 5 (2018)
Abstract
Street outreach has long been an essential practice method for locating people who are homeless to connect them to social and housing services.
Using in-depth interviews with street outreach workers, this study explored the meaning of outreach, skills and approaches used by outreach workers, and the challenges they experience in the day-to-day outreach practice.
The findings offer insights for creating a common language and set of techniques that can be utilized for street outreach and identifying implications for community intervention research, education, and practice.
Showing posts with label social_work_practices. Show all posts
Showing posts with label social_work_practices. Show all posts
Friday, 12 October 2018
Wednesday, 23 January 2013
Turning away from the public sector in children’s out-of-home care: An English experiment
an article by Nicky Stanley, Andy Bilson, Nicola Farrelly, Cath Larkins and Julie Ridley (School of Social Work, University of Central Lancashire, UK), Helen Austerberry (Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, London, UK) and Shereen Hussein and Jill Manthorpe (Social Care Workforce Research Unit, King’s College London, UK) published in Children and Youth Services Review
Volume 35 Issue 1 (January 2013)
Abstract
This paper reports on the evaluation of an English experiment which, for the first time, moved statutory social work support for children and young people in out-of-home care from the public to the private or independent sector.
Five social work practices (SWPs), independent or semi-independent of local government, were established and evaluated using a matched control design with integrated process evaluation.
Social work teams in the public sector, selected to correspond to key characteristics of the SWP sites, provided control sites. While most SWPs were perceived to be accessible and user-friendly organisations, children’s and young people’s accounts showed no differences between pilots and control sites in terms of workers’ accessibility and responsiveness.
Perceptions of SWP staff’s decision-making were mixed.
SWP staff reported spending more time in direct face-to-face work with children and families but this was attributed to reduced caseload size and a tight remit which excluded child protection work rather than to decreased bureaucracy. SWP staff morale was generally found to be high in terms of depersonalisation and social support, reflecting an emphasis on staff supervision in these organisations.
However, this was offset by slightly higher job insecurity which reflected the precariousness of employment in the independent as opposed to state sector. Staff retention varied between the SWPs, but although children and young people in the pilots were more likely to retain their key worker than those in control sites, they experienced disruption in the move into SWPs and back to public services when SWP contracts were not renewed.
While some SWPs succeeded in reducing placement change rates for children and young people, a policy of switching placement providers to achieve flexibility and savings increased placement change rates in some SWPs.
SWPs did not achieve financial independence from the local authority commissioners with only one assuming full responsibility for managing the placement budget. Payment by results was not used consistently.
None of the commissioners interviewed considered that the SWP model had resulted in savings.
The study highlighted the interdependence of public and private sectors. As small organisations, most of the SWPs succeeded in offering an accessible and personalised service, and public services should consider reorganising to achieve similar outcomes.
However, this evaluation found that contracted-out organisations struggled to provide children in out-of home care with the consistency and continuity they require.
Highlights
► This paper reports on a national evaluation of a policy experiment in England.
► Social work for children in out-of-home care was moved to independent organisations.
► The evaluation employed a mixed methods, matched control design.
► Social workers in the new services enjoyed lower caseloads and greater autonomy.
► Privatisation led to job insecurity and did not increase continuity for children.
Abstract
This paper reports on the evaluation of an English experiment which, for the first time, moved statutory social work support for children and young people in out-of-home care from the public to the private or independent sector.
Five social work practices (SWPs), independent or semi-independent of local government, were established and evaluated using a matched control design with integrated process evaluation.
Social work teams in the public sector, selected to correspond to key characteristics of the SWP sites, provided control sites. While most SWPs were perceived to be accessible and user-friendly organisations, children’s and young people’s accounts showed no differences between pilots and control sites in terms of workers’ accessibility and responsiveness.
Perceptions of SWP staff’s decision-making were mixed.
SWP staff reported spending more time in direct face-to-face work with children and families but this was attributed to reduced caseload size and a tight remit which excluded child protection work rather than to decreased bureaucracy. SWP staff morale was generally found to be high in terms of depersonalisation and social support, reflecting an emphasis on staff supervision in these organisations.
However, this was offset by slightly higher job insecurity which reflected the precariousness of employment in the independent as opposed to state sector. Staff retention varied between the SWPs, but although children and young people in the pilots were more likely to retain their key worker than those in control sites, they experienced disruption in the move into SWPs and back to public services when SWP contracts were not renewed.
While some SWPs succeeded in reducing placement change rates for children and young people, a policy of switching placement providers to achieve flexibility and savings increased placement change rates in some SWPs.
SWPs did not achieve financial independence from the local authority commissioners with only one assuming full responsibility for managing the placement budget. Payment by results was not used consistently.
None of the commissioners interviewed considered that the SWP model had resulted in savings.
The study highlighted the interdependence of public and private sectors. As small organisations, most of the SWPs succeeded in offering an accessible and personalised service, and public services should consider reorganising to achieve similar outcomes.
However, this evaluation found that contracted-out organisations struggled to provide children in out-of home care with the consistency and continuity they require.
Highlights
► This paper reports on a national evaluation of a policy experiment in England.
► Social work for children in out-of-home care was moved to independent organisations.
► The evaluation employed a mixed methods, matched control design.
► Social workers in the new services enjoyed lower caseloads and greater autonomy.
► Privatisation led to job insecurity and did not increase continuity for children.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
