an article by Younghee Noh, (Konkuk University, Chungju-Si, South Korea) published in Aslib Proceedings Volume 64 issue 2 (2012)
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the correlation between university libraries and academic research achievement and analyze if university library resources correlate with academic research achievement.
Design/methodology/approach
The paper seeks to verify the correlation between university libraries and academic research achievement and to examine which university library resources relate to research achievement. A variety of research questions were posed concerning the relationship between a university's library resources and academic research achievement. Structural equation models (SEMs) were developed to answer the research questions. Most research questions posed were affirmatively answered using the SEM process.
Findings
This study confirmed that labour and budget, investment in e-resources and an investment in university libraries enhances academic research achievement.
Research limitations/implications
An SEM for verifying the correlation between university libraries and academic research achievement was developed in the study.
Originality/value
This study is the first including an investment factor in e-resources for verifying the correlation between university libraries and academic research achievement.
Showing posts with label research_performance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label research_performance. Show all posts
Tuesday, 10 April 2012
Wednesday, 26 October 2011
Is concentration of university research associated with better research performance?
an article by Henk F. Moed (Elsevier, Amsterdam), Félix de Moya-Anegón and Carmen López-Illescas (Spanish National Research Council, Madrid) and Martijn Visser (Leiden University, the Netherlands) published in Journal of Informetrics Volume 5 Issue 4 (October 2011)
Abstract
This paper analyses relationships between university research performance and concentration of university research. Using the number of publications and their citation impact extracted from Scopus as proxies of research activity and research performance, respectively, it examines at a national level for 40 major countries the distribution of published research articles among its universities, and at an institutional level for a global set of 1500 universities the distribution of papers among 16 main subject fields.
Both at a national and an institutional level it was found that a larger publication output is associated with a higher citation impact. If one conceives the number of publications as a measure of concentration, this outcome indicates that, in university research, concentration and performance are positively related, although the underlying causal relationships are complex. But a regression analysis found no evidence that more concentration of research among a country's universities or among an institution's main fields is associated with better overall performance.
The study reveals a tendency that the research in a particular subject field conducted in universities specializing in other fields outperforms the work in that field in institutions specializing in that field. This outcome may reflect that it is multi-disciplinary research that is the most promising and visible at the international research front, and that this type of research tends to develop better in universities specializing in a particular domain and expanding their capabilities in that domain towards other fields.
Highlights
► It analyzes in Scopus a global set of as many as 1500 universities, and uses citation impact as performance indicator.
► The research question is: Does more concentration lead to better research? In four separate analyses the study found no empirical evidence that this is the case.
► In a group of 40 major countries found no significant linear or rank correlation between national research performance and the degree of concentration of research among their universities. Among top performing nations one finds both concentrated and more evenly distributed national academic systems in terms of research output.
► At the level of individual universities it was found that universities showing a high overall disciplinary specialization tend to have a lower citation impact than general academic institutions do, although the linear correlation is weak.
► This result may reflect that it is multi-disciplinary research that is the most promising and visible at the international research front, and that this type of research tends to develops better in general institutions covering a broad range of main fields than it does in specialized ones.
Abstract
This paper analyses relationships between university research performance and concentration of university research. Using the number of publications and their citation impact extracted from Scopus as proxies of research activity and research performance, respectively, it examines at a national level for 40 major countries the distribution of published research articles among its universities, and at an institutional level for a global set of 1500 universities the distribution of papers among 16 main subject fields.
Both at a national and an institutional level it was found that a larger publication output is associated with a higher citation impact. If one conceives the number of publications as a measure of concentration, this outcome indicates that, in university research, concentration and performance are positively related, although the underlying causal relationships are complex. But a regression analysis found no evidence that more concentration of research among a country's universities or among an institution's main fields is associated with better overall performance.
The study reveals a tendency that the research in a particular subject field conducted in universities specializing in other fields outperforms the work in that field in institutions specializing in that field. This outcome may reflect that it is multi-disciplinary research that is the most promising and visible at the international research front, and that this type of research tends to develop better in universities specializing in a particular domain and expanding their capabilities in that domain towards other fields.
Highlights
► It analyzes in Scopus a global set of as many as 1500 universities, and uses citation impact as performance indicator.
► The research question is: Does more concentration lead to better research? In four separate analyses the study found no empirical evidence that this is the case.
► In a group of 40 major countries found no significant linear or rank correlation between national research performance and the degree of concentration of research among their universities. Among top performing nations one finds both concentrated and more evenly distributed national academic systems in terms of research output.
► At the level of individual universities it was found that universities showing a high overall disciplinary specialization tend to have a lower citation impact than general academic institutions do, although the linear correlation is weak.
► This result may reflect that it is multi-disciplinary research that is the most promising and visible at the international research front, and that this type of research tends to develops better in general institutions covering a broad range of main fields than it does in specialized ones.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
