Showing posts with label psychological_contract_breach. Show all posts
Showing posts with label psychological_contract_breach. Show all posts

Wednesday, 29 November 2017

Job insecurity and work outcomes: The role of psychological contract breach and positive psychological capital

an article by Sandra Costa and Pedro Neves (Nova School of Business and Economics, Lisboa, Portugal) published in Work & Stress: An International Journal of Work, Health & Organisations Volume 31 Issue 4 (2017)

Abstract

Job insecurity has received growing attention from researchers because it poses serious challenges for organisations and for society as a whole. However, there are insufficient studies about the processes through which job insecurity affects outcomes as well as potential ways to reduce its negative impact.

This study focuses on the relationship between job insecurity and individual-level outcomes (in-role performance and organisational deviance) and examines if:
  1. job insecurity is positively and/or negatively related to work outcomes,
  2. psychological contract breach acts as a mediator of the relationship between job insecurity and work outcomes, and
  3. positive psychological capital (PsyCap) buffers the job insecurity–work outcomes relationship via psychological contract breach.
With a sample of 362 employee–supervisor dyads, in which the outcome measures were collected from the supervisors, we found support for our hypotheses. Specifically, we found a moderated mediation effect, whereby PsyCap moderates the negative indirect relationship of job insecurity on outcomes through psychological contract breach.


Tuesday, 6 November 2012

A close call: perceptions of alternative HR arrangements to layoffs

an article by Marjo-Riitta Parzefall, (Department of Strategy, Organization and Leadership, EBS Business School, Oestrich-Winkel, Germany) published in Journal of Managerial Psychology Volume 27 Issue 8 (2012)

Abstract

Purpose
Drawing on the concept of psychological contract and organizational justice, this exploratory case study seeks to examine how companies’ attempts to handle layoff pressures with alternative HR arrangements are perceived and experienced by the affected employees.
Design/methodology/approach
The study draws on 19 interviews of employees affected by job loss. The interviewees were employees in a case organization that had implemented a HR practice called the “Competence pool” as an alternative to layoffs.
Findings
Although contract breach occurs, alternative HR arrangements can mitigate the negative effects of job loss for the affected employees and help restore the psychological contract. Such arrangements have to be implemented with care in order to avoid injustice perceptions.
Research limitations/implications
As HR arrangements are by nature unique and company-specific, this study is limited by its focus on one organization and national context. It however provides future directions for research on layoffs and their consequences.
Practical implications
By exploring how the affected employees perceive an alternative to layoffs, this study has several implications for organizations interested in managing layoff pressures with alternative HR arrangements.
Originality/value
By investigating the experiences and perceptions of employees whose jobs were terminated but whose employment relationship continued under specific conditions, this study provides new insights into layoff and HR literatures from psychological contract and justice perspectives.