Showing posts with label gender_stereotypes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gender_stereotypes. Show all posts

Thursday, 5 April 2018

Quantifying stereotyping associations between gender and intellectual ability in films

a column by Ramiro Gálvez, Valeria Tiffenberg and Edgar Altszyler for VOX: CEPR’s Policy Portal

The belief that men possess greater cognitive abilities than women is a longstanding and well-documented stereotype, with studies showing that both boys and girls as young as six can view ‘brilliance’ as a predominantly male trait.

This column explores the contribution of the film industry in the West to perpetuating this stereotype.

An analysis of over 10,000 film transcripts reveals the persistent presence of the ‘brilliance = male’ stereotype over the past half a century, including in movies specifically aimed at children.

Continue reading


Tuesday, 30 October 2012

Assessing gender biases: Development and initial validation of the gender role stereotypes scale

an article by Maura J. Mills (Hofstra University, New York, USA), Satoris S. Culbertson and Angela R. Connell (Kansas State University, USA) and Ann H. Huffman (Northern Arizona University, USA) published in Gender in Management: An International Journal Volume 27 Issue 8 )2012)

Abstract

Purpose
The purpose of this research is to develop and validate a new gender role stereotypes scale intended to be a short, effective, and modern measure of gender role attitudes.
Design/methodology/approach
A total of 800 participants completed an online survey, with 546 completing a second survey one week later. Recommended scale development procedures were utilized throughout in order to design and test the proposed instrument.
Findings
Item analyses determined a final set of most effective items, while exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses provided support for the eight-item, two-dimensional (female stereotypes, male stereotypes) scale (Gender Role Stereotypes Scale – GRSS). Additionally, internal consistency and test-retest reliabilities were acceptable, as was the construct-related validity. This study also finds that gender role stereotypes are best examined as a two-factor construct (male, female), rather than conceptualized as two poles of a unidimensional continuum.
Practical implications
The GRSS has advantages over similar measures, including that it assesses attitudes toward both men and women with only eight items, and includes items that are easily understandable, cross-culturally appropriate, and modern. Practitioners can use the GRSS to assess potential gender role stereotypes held by management. If managers are found to have highly traditional gender role stereotypes, organizations may be able to intervene before stereotypes affect performance ratings or task assignments.
Originality/value
This paper yields an updated and sound measurement scale to replace outdated scales assessing similar constructs and/or assessing only one gender role stereotype (male or female, versus both). The GRSS allows for the parsimonious, comprehensive, and effective measurement of gender role stereotypes in research and practice alike.