Showing posts with label feedback. Show all posts
Showing posts with label feedback. Show all posts

Thursday, 14 December 2017

3 Ways to Decide Whose Opinion of You Matters

a post by Joui Turandot for the Tiny Buddha blog


“The most courageous act is still to think for yourself. Aloud.” ~Coco Chanel

“You know, Joui, I really like how you look tonight. I always thought your style before was… just a little wacky,” smiled Harry, a man I’d met during a forced networking meeting. He then smirked knowingly, like he was doing me a great favor.

Inside I screamed.

As a stylist one of the biggest fears my clients mention when we discuss any big change is feedback, judgment, and shame from their peers. And they are right to be fearful.

People will have commentary, trust me. But while everyone has an opinion, not everyone has a clue.

So we must be extremely careful who we let give us feedback.

Continue reading


Sunday, 15 February 2009

Student perceptions of the effectiveness of group and individualized feedbac...

an article by Philip Ice in First Monday

Abstract
While an abundance of research exists on best practices in the face-to-face classroom, the same is not true for online learning. In this new and constantly evolving environment, researchers are just beginning to understand what constitutes effective learning strategies. One of the most well-recognised models for explaining online learning is the Community of Inquiry Framework (CoI). However, despite its recent empirical validation, the CoI provides only general indicators of effectiveness, not guides to specific practices. This study looks at a common practice, providing students with feedback, and assesses whether narrowly-targeted, individualised feedback or group feedback is more effective. Through mixed methods research the authors examined student preferences and strategies by student level, finding that, while there is no one best solution, there are strategies that appear most appropriate for different learner levels. Suggestions for implementing best practices and directions for future research are also discussed.

Full text
PS. I found this scheduled for publication in September 2009. I have no idea when I should have published it!