an article by Marci Shore published in Eurozine December 2017
In 2014, Russian historian Andrei Zubov was fired from his Moscow professorship for comparing Putin’s annexation of Crimea to Hitler’s annexation of the Sudetenland. Two years later, at a festival in the post-industrial Czech city of Ostrava, Zubov spoke to a large audience about the task of historians. ‘My dolzhni govorit’ pravdu’, he said. We should speak the truth. This declaration – all the more so when uttered in Zubov’s baritone – sounded quaint, even old-fashioned. In particular, the Slavic word pravda – truth – invoked with no qualification and no prefix, suggested a bygone era. Who believed in truth anymore?
The end of ‘The End of History’ arrived together with the end of belief in reality. The Cold War world was a world of warring ideologies; in the twenty-first century, both American capitalism and post-Soviet oligarchy employ the same public relations specialists catering to gangsters with political ambitions. As Peter Pomerantsev described in Nothing is True and Everything is Possible, in the Russia of the 2000s, distinguishing between truth and lies became passé. In this world of enlightened, postmodern people, ‘everything is PR’.
Reality television has rendered obsolete the boundary between the fictional and the real. Truth is a constraint that has been overcome; ‘post-truth’ has been declared ‘word of the year.’ In Washington, the White House shamelessly defends its ‘alternative facts’. At the beginning, American journalists were taken off-guard: they had been trained to confirm individual pieces of information, not to confront a brazen untethering from empirical reality. The New Yorker captured the desperation with a satire about the fact-checker who passed out from exhaustion after the Republican debate. He had to be hospitalized; apparently no one replaced him.
Continue reading
Continue reading
Showing posts with label facts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label facts. Show all posts
Thursday, 1 February 2018
Thursday, 11 June 2015
Labour market deregulation: when the facts change…
a blog post by Owen Tudor in the Touchstone (from TUC) blog
The famous remark, commonly attributed to Keynes, that “when the facts change, I change my mind…” could be about to face a stern test. The IMF is about to publish the findings of research by staff members that finds no evidence that labour market deregulation promotes growth.
This will prove most uncomfortable for those right-wing politicians and pundits who promote restricting workers’ rights in the name of economic well-being, as well as the IMF itself (and some misguided centre left politicians too, if the European Commission and several continental socialist governments are anything to go by).
So they’re likely to ignore it.
That’s why it’s important for you to know, so you can keep reminding them what the facts are.
Continue reading
The famous remark, commonly attributed to Keynes, that “when the facts change, I change my mind…” could be about to face a stern test. The IMF is about to publish the findings of research by staff members that finds no evidence that labour market deregulation promotes growth.
This will prove most uncomfortable for those right-wing politicians and pundits who promote restricting workers’ rights in the name of economic well-being, as well as the IMF itself (and some misguided centre left politicians too, if the European Commission and several continental socialist governments are anything to go by).
So they’re likely to ignore it.
That’s why it’s important for you to know, so you can keep reminding them what the facts are.
Continue reading
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
