an article by David Sweeting (University of Bristol, UK) and Robin Hambleton (University of the West of England, Bristol, UK; Director of Urban Answers) published in Urban Studies Volume 57 Issue 5 (April 2020)
Abstract
Within the context of debates regarding depoliticisation, this article considers how the introduction of a directly elected mayor system of governance impacts on urban politics.
Directly elected mayors are now a fundamental feature of many political systems. They have been widely introduced as a reform to improve processes of local democracy, enhance the effectiveness of governing practices and to offer a more potent form of city leadership.
This article focuses on developments in England, by presenting the case of Bristol, a city epitomising many aspects of modern neo-liberalised urban development. Bristol adopted a mayoral system in 2012 and the article presents empirical data from before and after this reform pertaining to two frameworks to understand city leadership.
We conclude that the move to mayoral governance, in Bristol in the 2012–2016 period, eroded the influence of party politics and led to the adoption of elements of a leadership style associated with a depoliticisation of urban politics in the city. Nevertheless, the analysis suggests that the mayoral model also provides significant space for the expansion of political agency on the part of the city leader, not least because power becomes concentrated in the mayoral position.
Labels:
city_leadership, depoliticisation, directly_elected_mayors, governance, local governmen_, politics,
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment